Investigating the Validity of Achievement Tests in the Algerian Secondary Schools: The Case of EFL Classes in the Biskra Region

  • Hoadjli Ahmed Chaouki University of Biskra

Résumé

يدور مضمون هذا المقال حول موضوع التقويم التربوي بصفة عامة و إشكالية بناء الاختبارات الفصلية بصفة خاصة بالمدرسة الجزائرية و تحديدا بالنسبة لطلبة الثانوي بولاية بسكرة ، تطرقنا لهذا الموضوع بالذات نابع من ملاحظاتنا الدائمة حول عدم وجود تطابق بين محتوى الاختبارات المقدمة لتلاميذ هذا الطور و ما يدرس خلال الفصل أو السنة الدراسية .و عليه فإن الهدف الأساسي لهذا المقال هو إجراء عملية تقويم لهذا النوع من الاختبارات و الوقوف على طريقة بنائها و ذلك من أجل تحديد النقائص و اقتراح بعض الإصلاحات لجعل هذه الاختبارات ذات فائدة.  

 

This article sets out to explore the issue of evaluation in general and testing in particular within the Algerian context. The motives of such an investigation stems from the students' low scores that do not actually reflect their real performance by virtue of the non-pertinence between what students learn and what they are tested in. Therefore, the main purpose of the present article is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the achievement tests to the EFL classes in the Biskra region.

Références

• Bachman, L. F. (1997). Fundamental consideration in language testing. (4th. Ed). Oxford, New York. Oxford University Press.
• Bachman, L.F., & Palmer, A.S. (2000). Language testing in practice.
Oxford, New York. Oxford University Press.
• Bell, J. (1987). Doing your research project: a guide for first time researchers in education and Social sciences. Milton, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
• Berry, V. (1983). Personality characteristics as a potential source of language test bias. In Alderson, J. C., and B., editors, language testing, 17 (1). 1-10.
• Brown, H. D. (1987). Principles of language learning and teaching.
Eaglewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• Calapham, C. (1993). The Effect of language proficiency on EAP students' reading comprehension. In Alderson, J. C., and B., editors., in language testing, 17(1), 1-10.
• Carmen, P.B. (1995). Coming to grips with progress testing. In
forum magazine, 33(3), 09-55.
• Carroll, J. B. (1968). The psychology of language testing. In A. Davies (Ed.). Language testing Symposium: A psycholinguistic approach. London. Oxford University Press, 06-46.
• Cohen, A. D. (1980). Testing language ability in the classroom.
Rowley, Mass: News burry house.
• Corder, S. P. (1973). Introducing applied linguistics. Middlesex,
England. The Penguin Books Ltd.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaire in second language research:
construction; administration, and Processing. Mahwah; NJ:
Lawrence E and L Baum Associates. In TESL-EJ, 6(3).
• Genesee, F., & Upshur, J. A. (1996). Classroom –based evaluation in
second language education. Cambridge, U. K: Cambridge
University Press.
• Good, T. M &Brophy, J. (1991). Educational psychology: A realistic
approach. (4th Ed.). Longman.
• Hedge, T. (1993). Key concepts in ELT fluency. In English teaching
journal, vol (47), 275-277
• Henning, G. (1978). Developing English language proficiency
measures for native speakers of Arabic. UCLA work-papers in
teaching English as a second language, vol (12).
• Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge, U.K:
Cambridge University Press.
• Kunnan, A. J. (1988). Approaches to validation in language
assessment. In Alderson, J. C., & B., Editors, language
testing, 17(1), 11-2.
• Lado, R. (1959). Language testing. New York: Mc Graw- Hill.
• Lew Kowicz, J. A. (2000). Authenticity in language testing: some
outstanding questions. In Alderson,J.C. and B. Editors,
testing 17(1), 3-12.
• Sasaki, M. (1986). Second language proficiency, foreign language,
aptitude and intelligence: quantitative and qualitative
analyses. In Alderson, J. C& B. Editors, language testing, 17
(1), 1-10.
• Sparks, R. L., et al. (1998). Differences: a native language skill,
foreign language aptitude among high –average, and low-
proficiency language users: two studies. In language testing,
17(1), 01-10.
• Rea- Dickins, P., &Germaine. (1992). Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
• Rirely, G. L., &Lee, G. F. (1996). A comparison of recall and
summary protocols as measures of second language reading
comprehension. In Alderson, J. C. &B. Editors, language
testing 17(1), 01-10.
• Weir. J. (1988). Communicative language testing. Exeter linguistics
Studies, vol (11). University of Exeter.
• Mc Nammara, T. (1996). Second language performance measuring.
London and New York: Longman.
• Philliner, A. G. (1968). Subjective and objective testing. In A.
Davies (Ed), language testing symposium. A psycholinguistic
perspective. London: Oxford University Press.
Comment citer
AHMED CHAOUKI, Hoadjli. Investigating the Validity of Achievement Tests in the Algerian Secondary Schools: The Case of EFL Classes in the Biskra Region. Sciences humaines, [S.l.], v. 29, juin 2014. ISSN 1112-3176. Disponible à l'adresse : >http://revues.univ-biskra.dz/index.php/sh/article/view/711>. Date de consultation : 03 fév. 2023
Rubrique
Articles